Originally posted by Schneiderman
Firstly, I still think Vogels would make a better CHB and should be given a run at it when we are not interested in winning games (next years pre-season or later this year if it all goes to @@@@).
Firstly, I still think Vogels would make a better CHB and should be given a run at it when we are not interested in winning games (next years pre-season or later this year if it all goes to @@@@).
BUT:
1. LRT played ok. He has been steadily improving this year IMO, and looks more comfortable in his role every week. At the current rate of progression (and hopefully a good run in the finals) he should be a solid to good CHB by Round 1 next year.
In that case he should stay there. To get a good CHB that can play there for the next 8 years is a good investment.
[/B][/QUOTE]
2. He needs to learn to punch. It looks to me like he does a lot of slapping at the ball, and his spoils rarely make solid contact.
[/QUOTE][/B]
Even our rucks do that. Must be a team ethos.
3. He needs to wear gloves. Even if it only gives him a psychological advantage. Cornes and Leppitsch have done it in the past.
Marking will come with confidence.
4. His decision-making needs to improve - hopefully experience is all thats required, but he certainly seemed a bit more proactive on Saturday. There were no rabbit-in-headlight pauses with the footy that we gotten so used to.
Marking will come with confidence.

How so, Ruckman???
Comment