Lrt

[Ruda Wakening]

Originally posted by giant

God help us if LRT actually ever gets dropped - this forum will be lifeless.

I just hope LRT's still in the side when Fosdike comes back.

[giant]

Nice work Bloods! And you weren't mean to Barry once....

[ROK Lobster]

Originally posted by NMWBloods
Some think LRT's a great back
Yet others believe he's a hack
It's important to be objective
But without the invective

and then choose your own last line:

To quote Lleyton, "Spac attack!"

[barry]

Originally posted by Ruckman
I'd interpret it as a LOB (Load of Bollocks), but I don't think I'd repond with a post that makes it look as though barry was claiming Waite never played on LRT (Lewis Robert-Thompson) in order to elicit a response from other RWO's (Red &WHite Onliners) that barry was a TDA (Total Dumb Arse).

Occupational hazard when discussing anything with NMWBloods that he doesnt agree with. Here, as in the workplace, you just try to minimize the hazard.


... or throw petrol on it.

[NMWBloods]

Ruckman thinks your view was LOB!

[barry]

Originally posted by NMWBloods
Ruckman thinks your view was LOB!

I guess that makes "everyone" then.

I wonder why LRT didnt follow Waite down to the swans forward line in the 1st half then ?

[NMWBloods]

Originally posted by barry
I guess that makes "everyone" then.

He was just one of a few. I still haven't found any views to the contrary.

I wonder why LRT didnt follow Waite down to the swans forward line in the 1st half then ?

He probably should have at times. At other times probably not as it crowds our forward line even more.

[barry]

Originally posted by NMWBloods
[B]He was just one of a few. I still haven't found any views to the contrary.

He probably should have at times. At other times probably not as it crowds our forward line even more.

Youve just found yourself.

[ScottH]

Originally posted by barry
I wonder why LRT didnt follow Waite down to the swans forward line in the 1st half then ?

He didn't follow Riewodlt when he went down the swans F50 either. Maybe that is his instructions, or he just lost his opponent.

[NMWBloods]

Originally posted by barry
Youve just found yourself.

In what way? What does that mean anyway?

If LRT doesn't follow his man when Carlton are flooding doesn't meant LRT is no longer on/responsible for Waite.

When the opponents are flooding, the backmen have to work out when to make themselves a target in the F50 and when to stay out so they don't crowd it.

If Waite is in the backline or midfield because he has come up the ground, that in no way invalidates the view that LRT was playing on him for the first three quarters.

There may be plenty of rotations and switches in modern football, but it is still 18 on 18, and everyone still needs to be responsible for an opponent.

[Ruck'n'Roll]

Originally posted by NMWBloods
It's normal, not just in Shakespeare, that certain questions written a certain way are taken as accusations. [/i]

Put your analyst on danger money, and try for a bulk discount.

Originally posted by NMWBloods
Some think LRT's a great back
Yet others believe he's a hack
It's important to be objective
But without the invective

and then choose your own last line:

And his future progress we'll track

Yet when he gets the ball it's a cack

In our wall of defence he's the crack

At least in his work he's not slack

A work ethic is something he does not lack

Of looking ungainly he has the knack

Yet when he gets the ball the spectators pack

Still, if like a duck it does quack...

SIC (Sniggering in the Corner, just like LOL but quieter)!

[Ruck'n'Roll]

I'm so glad it's only 3 sleeps until the next LRT thread starts.

[sharpie]

Originally posted by Ruckman
I'm so glad it's only 3 sleeps until the next LRT thread starts.

Yeah, I wonder what new and exciting stuff the new thread will contain!?

[NMWBloods]

Just keep an eye on barry's posts and you'll be sure to see it when it pops up again.

I think we'll get see some photos of LRT's cape and an explanation on the benefits of wearing his underpants on the outside.

[ROK Lobster]

Originally posted by sharpie
Yeah, I wonder what new and exciting stuff the new thread will contain!?

LRT (1 kick, 2 handballs, 2 marks, 1 free for, 4 frees against, 2 clumsy stacks, 1 crawl on knees 2nd effort) destroys Pavlich (17 kicks, 7 handballs, 14 marks, 1 free against, 4 frees for, 5 goals, 2 behinds)*




*none of those possessions recorded while LRT was on him. LRT spent considerable time on other players.