Barrygate

[ugg]

Originally posted by NMWBloods
The funny about Maguire, is that when he goes down he doesn't really hold any part of his body in pain, which is normally what happens when you get punched in the stomach, chest, etc. Does suggest it may have been a bit put on or simply aggravating another injury.

Hmm, you're not Barry's father are you? That's exactly what Mr Hall snr said today. I'm still confident Maguire will testify in Barry's favour, regardless of whether he was actually faking or not. Its whether the tribunal accepts this that is the biggest worry.

[Ajn]

CONDUCT: Negligent
CONTACT: Body
IMPACT: Low
LOCATION: Behind play
ACTIVATION POINTS = 5
LEVEL 1 STRIKING CHARGE = 125 points
DISCOUNT: 25% for early plea = 93.75
VERDICT: Hall would not be suspended but would carry the points for 12 months.

Best case scenario....let's all hope.

That said I think we have enough to win without him given our multiple forward options and their lack of clear defenders. There is no scarlett to woory about, etc.

[ROK Lobster]

Originally posted by Ajn

That said I think we have enough to win without him given our multiple forward options and their lack of clear defenders.

Yeah but, I feel for him and his mates. I'm going to have a great time win lose or draw. Whether we win lose or draw and he is in the stands he will have one of the ********iest days of his life. After all the work he has done to control his anger, to be rubbed out for a GF for something as minor as that would be cruel.

[Ruda Wakening]

Originally posted by NMWBloods
Does suggest it may have been a bit put on or simply aggravating another injury.

I hope they ask Maguire how he was feeling at the 11 minute 17 seconds mark of the game. If you've got the game on tape have a look. Dal Santo 'spoils' BBB's mark in the goalsquare. Maguire was totally stuffed and clearly in some form of distress at that stage which was before the Claytons tummy tap.

[Slick Swans]

Originally posted by Ajn
CONDUCT: Negligent

ACTIVATION POINTS = 5

Can anyone tell me what these 2 things mean?

[Lucky Knickers]

Originally posted by NMWBloods
The funny about Maguire, is that when he goes down he doesn't really hold any part of his body in pain, which is normally what happens when you get punched in the stomach, chest, etc. Does suggest it may have been a bit put on or simply aggravating another injury.

I think that after incident Maguire looks up and around to his left...in direction of play toward umpire...

Does the tribunal look at the both players actions after the event or just the event itself?

Also - any word from Maguir?

[Matt79]

Originally posted by punter257
and i also hate how everyone seems to think that because hall did boxing it makes it worse - WTF has that got to do with it.

so if stephen king was a kickboxer would he have gone up a few weeks ago?

As King got off for that round house kickboxing manourve then it will be a discrace if Hall even gets cited.

[NMWBloods]

Originally posted by Ajn
CONDUCT: Negligent
CONTACT: Body
IMPACT: Low
LOCATION: Behind play
ACTIVATION POINTS = 5
LEVEL 1 STRIKING CHARGE = 125 points
DISCOUNT: 25% for early plea = 93.75
VERDICT: Hall would not be suspended but would carry the points for 12 months.

Best case scenario....let's all hope.

That said I think we have enough to win without him given our multiple forward options and their lack of clear defenders. There is no scarlett to woory about, etc.

This is the best-case scenario from The Age.

They may not have Scarlett but Glass has smashed Hall the past few times.

[NMWBloods]

Originally posted by Ruda Wakening
I hope they ask Maguire how he was feeling at the 11 minute 17 seconds mark of the game. If you've got the game on tape have a look. Dal Santo 'spoils' BBB's mark in the goalsquare. Maguire was totally stuffed and clearly in some form of distress at that stage which was before the Claytons tummy tap.

Yeah - noticed the same thing and also in another pack situation. Maguire was completely non match fit - I'm amazed he was selected.

[Go Swannies]

As both were going for the ball as it was coming down the field, it seems to be the expert view that it in play. And possibly the blow was to the arm not body.

[timbo]

Can anyone tell me what these 2 things mean?

Conduct is the type of charge. It can be negligent, accidental, reckless, intentional etc. It grades light to heavy. Neglegent being the lightest.

Activation points is the number of factors added together.

(just guessing here)

heavy impact over light impact would warrant more activation points. 5 activation points means it must go to the tribunal with 125 points.

[Ruda Wakening]

Originally posted by Mike_B
We already know how inconsistent the tribunal is. Compare the Gehrig suspension with the no suspension for Koschitzke on Corey and a couple of the Glenn Archer efforts.

Dean Solomon on Gary Ablett.

[anniswan]

I have just re inacted the incident and realised that it would have been very hard for Barry to have hit Macguires torso, we did it 5 times and each time it was only my son's arm that I hit forcefully.

Macguire is a dog if he doesn't testify that he didn't play for the free.

[Go Swannies]

Originally posted by anniswan
I have just re inacted the incident and realised that it would have been very hard for Barry to have hit Macguires torso, we did it 5 times and each time it was only my son's arm that I hit forcefully.

Macguire is a dog if he doesn't testify that he didn't play for the free.

Can I take this over to BigFooty as a thread on child abuse?

Is your son recovering well Annie?

Warning: what you see on TV should not be tried at home!

[NMWBloods]

I keep doing it to people I walk past in the street, and so far it's only 70 year old women who actually fall over and struggle to get back up...