Still ongoing but miles apart from all reports, a farcical situation for clubs that need certainty in respect of offering new contracts.
I imagine this is a huge issue in us determining our final offer to Tom
http://www.foxsports.com.au/afl/afl-...1f69430baaa82d is an interesting article. Personally I fully support the players getting what they fully deserve as lon as t hey don't get too greedy. I find Schwarz, who is quoted in that article, a prize prat
If you take the increase of $167m a year and strip out the player's share at 27% you get $45M which divided by 18 is an extra $2.5m a year per club.
You'd need to phase that in rather than a one-off jump but if I was Gill the Dill I'd be suggesting an initial $1m a year increase for 2017 followed by an extra $300,000 a year for the following five years to get the required $2.5m increase. The players will probably argue that other areas of overall revenue are also increasing (do they get 27% of all the horrendous gambling profits that the Melbourne clubs generate) but at the very least, on a back of a postage stamp analysis this would seem a sound starting point. And it's not too far from what has been reported in the press.
How about $1m initially and then 3% year on year increase for 2018-22?
I imagine this is a huge issue in us determining our final offer to Tom
http://www.foxsports.com.au/afl/afl-...1f69430baaa82d is an interesting article. Personally I fully support the players getting what they fully deserve as lon as t hey don't get too greedy. I find Schwarz, who is quoted in that article, a prize prat
If you take the increase of $167m a year and strip out the player's share at 27% you get $45M which divided by 18 is an extra $2.5m a year per club.
You'd need to phase that in rather than a one-off jump but if I was Gill the Dill I'd be suggesting an initial $1m a year increase for 2017 followed by an extra $300,000 a year for the following five years to get the required $2.5m increase. The players will probably argue that other areas of overall revenue are also increasing (do they get 27% of all the horrendous gambling profits that the Melbourne clubs generate) but at the very least, on a back of a postage stamp analysis this would seem a sound starting point. And it's not too far from what has been reported in the press.
How about $1m initially and then 3% year on year increase for 2018-22?

Comment