2016 trading and drafting (merged thread)

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • wolftone57
    Veterans List
    • Aug 2008
    • 5835

    Originally posted by longmile
    Why arent we delisting Hiscox
    i don't think we have finished yet. He might be downgraded not delisted

    - - - Updated - - -

    Originally posted by Ludwig
    Terry Wallace gave the Swans a D- in the trade period. He felt Tom Mitchell was a big loss and we didn't get anyone in to replace him. He also said that Sydney used to be the masters of the trade period but didn't pull off any big deals this year.

    He doesn't seem to realise that we have Heeney, Mill, Jones and Hewett waiting to fill TM's shoes in the midfield. And he doesn't realise that we have no obvious holes in our list. He must be aware of the salary cap pressure on the Swans as well as other clubs. So who could we bring in to help our list? I wasn't interested in any of the players on the market this year. Even is JOM was available, how could we afford him with Heeney, Jones, JPK and Reid coming out of contract next year.


    I imagine we would be looking for another home for Jack Hiscox, although it's a long shot. I'm am pretty sure he will be delsted after the trade period.

    You could even throw Foote & Davis into the mids mix. Both are more than capable Davis in many positions.

    Comment

    • caj23
      Senior Player
      • Aug 2003
      • 2462

      Originally posted by longmile
      Why arent we delisting Hiscox
      What's the rush?

      - - - Updated - - -

      Oh well, Marley Williams to the Kangaroos for pick 105

      Reckon we should have had a shot at him, although the pies obviously weren't keen to keep him so perhaps more off field issues??

      Comment

      • Levii3
        Regular in the Side
        • Jun 2015
        • 655

        Originally posted by caj23

        Reckon we should have had a shot at him, although the pies obviously weren't keen to keep him so perhaps more off field issues??
        Injury issues not off field.

        Comment

        • Dan
          Warming the Bench
          • Oct 2010
          • 338

          Originally posted by caj23
          Oh well, Marley Williams to the Kangaroos for pick 105

          Reckon we should have had a shot at him, although the pies obviously weren't keen to keep him so perhaps more off field issues??
          You also have to consider the fact that he may not have been interested in moving to NSW
          I See It But I Don't Believe It!!!!

          Comment

          • MadCanuck
            Warming the Bench
            • Mar 2009
            • 138

            Gee Hoskins-Elliot, Williams, Dunn, Black, Stewart all going at bargain basement prices. Is there one more roll of the dice for the Swans?

            Comment

            • bloodspirit
              Clubman
              • Apr 2015
              • 4448

              Hoskin-Elliot is the pick of that bunch. Stewart next behind him, I reckon. Wouldn't have minded seeing either of those guys come to our club at the cost they were traded.
              All opinions are not equal. Some are a very great deal more robust, sophisticated, and well supported in logic and argument than others. -Douglas Adams, author (11 Mar 1952-2001)

              Comment

              • Auntie.Gerald
                Veterans List
                • Oct 2009
                • 6474

                I wonder if X or Towers will nominate for Draft ?
                "be tough, only when it gets tough"

                Comment

                • longmile
                  Crumber
                  • Apr 2011
                  • 3360

                  Bloody Hawks

                  Comment

                  • Foreign Legion
                    Senior Player
                    • Feb 2003
                    • 3315

                    SEN reporting we swapped a stack of pics to Port for Pick 9 - we must have someone targeted in the Draft.

                    - - - Updated - - -

                    We have picks 9, 19 and 41 I think - not too bad

                    Comment

                    • Levii3
                      Regular in the Side
                      • Jun 2015
                      • 655

                      Originally posted by Foreign Legion
                      SEN reporting we swapped a stack of pics to Port for Pick 9 - we must have someone targeted in the Draft.
                      Harley said something about a top 10 pick on trade radio but no follow up question was asked..

                      Comment

                      • Dan
                        Warming the Bench
                        • Oct 2010
                        • 338

                        Originally posted by Foreign Legion
                        SEN reporting we swapped a stack of pics to Port for Pick 9 - we must have someone targeted in the Draft.

                        - - - Updated - - -

                        We have picks 9, 19 and 41 I think - not too bad
                        I like the sound of 9 and 19 more than 14 and 17. Hopefully we can draft some good talent.
                        I See It But I Don't Believe It!!!!

                        Comment

                        • Nico
                          Veterans List
                          • Jan 2003
                          • 11328

                          Originally posted by Ludwig
                          Terry Wallace gave the Swans a D- in the trade period. He felt Tom Mitchell was a big loss and we didn't get anyone in to replace him. He also said that Sydney used to be the masters of the trade period but didn't pull off any big deals this year.

                          He doesn't seem to realise that we have Heeney, Mill, Jones and Hewett waiting to fill TM's shoes in the midfield. And he doesn't realise that we have no obvious holes in our list. He must be aware of the salary cap pressure on the Swans as well as other clubs. So who could we bring in to help our list? I wasn't interested in any of the players on the market this year. Even is JOM was available, how could we afford him with Heeney, Jones, JPK and Reid coming out of contract next year.


                          I imagine we would be looking for another home for Jack Hiscox, although it's a long shot. I'm am pretty sure he will be delsted after the trade period.
                          Maybe that's another reason why he is a failed coach.

                          - - - Updated - - -

                          Originally posted by Dan
                          You also have to consider the fact that he may not have been interested in moving to NSW
                          Or that he is not much good.
                          http://www.nostalgiamusic.co.uk/secu...res/srh806.jpg

                          Comment

                          • Foreign Legion
                            Senior Player
                            • Feb 2003
                            • 3315

                            Supposedly the recruiters are saying this is the best Draft in 30 years - if it has been going that long. Surely we get a KPD as priority - and think about a ruckman.

                            Comment

                            • Ludwig
                              Veterans List
                              • Apr 2007
                              • 9359

                              Originally posted by longmile
                              Bloody Hawks
                              The Hawks are finished. They won't make the 8 for many years to come. They have no draft picks this year so will have to take a couple of duds at the end of the draft and they don't have a 1st rounder for next year. If you look at their list, they don't have much in the way of good young players except for Tom Mitchell and JOM. I don't think that's enough to carry the club after stars like Hodge, Burgoyne and Gibson drop away.

                              I don't think Geelong have done very well and don't look to be improving their list.

                              Collingwood had a disaster of a trade period.

                              It will take a while to figure out what happened to GWS, but it seems that they have lost most of their excess of top players. They still go into the draft in a strong position to add to already very good list, but the gap over other clubs is not as great as it was going into the trade period.

                              Comment

                              • bloodspirit
                                Clubman
                                • Apr 2015
                                • 4448

                                I can't help feeling bitter and jealous about GWS selling all their top draft picks to Carlton cheap as chips. Except that GWS had no choice you'd have to classify GWS as a major loser of this trade period. A lot of talent out the door and not nearly as much coming back the other way. I don't think their NEAFL team will be as strong next year. Which perhaps is as it should be. Let them come back to the pack a little in terms of their stockpiled talent, they'll still have a best 22 that will be the envy of most if not the crazy depth to go with it.
                                All opinions are not equal. Some are a very great deal more robust, sophisticated, and well supported in logic and argument than others. -Douglas Adams, author (11 Mar 1952-2001)

                                Comment

                                Working...