2019 trading, drafting and list management: players and personnel

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • longmile
    Crumber
    • Apr 2011
    • 3362

    When will we find out about Bennell? Rookie draft?

    Comment

    • Aprilbr
      Senior Player
      • Oct 2016
      • 1803

      A reasonable result for us in the end. I thought that they would do the Papley deal in the end but no dice. Ok not brilliant deal on Jones. We should be able to draft some good young talent now with our first 3 picks.

      Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk

      Comment

      • stevoswan
        Veterans List
        • Sep 2014
        • 8546

        Losers? Carlton......

        Comment

        • Blood Fever
          Veterans List
          • Apr 2007
          • 4040

          Originally posted by Auntie.Gerald
          So this draft we have:

          5
          25
          32
          44

          Carlton just stated pick 9 was involved to try and get paps !!!!

          Carlton fails
          Swans no other true midfielder to replace Jones?
          Not sure if Taylor plays some midfield? Blakey and Rowbottom to improve. Heeney fitter- Florent improving..Oriordan? Papley pinch hits.Bennell?

          Comment

          • Faunac8
            Senior Player
            • Mar 2014
            • 1548

            Originally posted by stevoswan
            .....and done.

            - - - Updated - - -

            Bonar to the Roos.
            Fair pick up for them

            Comment

            • MattW
              Veterans List
              • May 2011
              • 4196

              If we finish 5th next year and they finish 10th, it rates Jones at pick 28.

              Comment

              • Foreign Legion
                Senior Player
                • Feb 2003
                • 3341

                Apparently Essendon are Ok according to Kane Cornes because they held on to an injury prone Daniher....we are losers in the Trade period however.

                Comment

                • stevoswan
                  Veterans List
                  • Sep 2014
                  • 8546

                  Originally posted by Faunac8
                  Fair pick up for them
                  I agree. I thought we might have had some interest, given our midfield needs.....

                  Comment

                  • Ludwig
                    Veterans List
                    • Apr 2007
                    • 9359

                    Jones deal is for an equivalent 23 or 24, I would say, valuing the future swap at around 200 points. That's fine. About the same as the Langdon deal.

                    We improved our draft position both this year and next/

                    I feel that Papley wasn't really all that keen to go. It was just some 'family' pressure. He loves the Swans.

                    And we can wait till next year for Daniher if we still want him. We can now play both Naismith and Sinclair, fitness willing, in the same side. It also helps sort out our KPP situation, where we've got a lot of players, but we can now buy time to see who is worth keeping and who is not.

                    My grade for the Swans trade period is an A.

                    Comment

                    • MattW
                      Veterans List
                      • May 2011
                      • 4196

                      Originally posted by Foreign Legion
                      Apparently Essendon are Ok according to Kane Cornes because they held on to an injury prone Daniher....we are losers in the Trade period however.
                      Ha. Whatever.

                      We:
                      - have 4 picks in the first three rounds, including pick 5.
                      - picked up a former Rising Star.
                      - held on to our top goalscorer in 2019.

                      Comment

                      • Aprilbr
                        Senior Player
                        • Oct 2016
                        • 1803

                        I feel some sense of relief. A Daniher deal where we gave up 5, 9 (Jones) and a good young player like McCartin for Joe was just too risky. Mortgaging the future for a very uncertain outcome. Some might see us as losing out today but let's see how it all looks in 12 months time!

                        Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk

                        Comment

                        • 707
                          Veterans List
                          • Aug 2009
                          • 6204

                          It gives us a year without a big Daniher salary and a year to see if he gets fit. If he still wants to come next year we can get him free or trade, wasn't an immediate need for where we are.

                          Lost Jones, added Taylor, improved draft position this year and 2020.

                          Made a statement we are not massively over paying for players nor are we letting guys out of contracts. Well done to the traders and club, I'm happy.

                          Comment

                          • sprite
                            Regular in the Side
                            • Jan 2003
                            • 813

                            Waiting for Bozo Barrett come out say we failed in the trade period, if we failed where does that put Essendon.
                            sprite

                            Comment

                            • longmile
                              Crumber
                              • Apr 2011
                              • 3362

                              Originally posted by Ludwig
                              My grade for the Swans trade period is an A.
                              TBH it was a B or C. Only reason you could give it an A because it could of been so so much worse with trading all our picks for Daniher and losing Papley and Jones for nothing like the media was making out. An A would of seen a decent ruck or inside mid come into the side

                              Comment

                              • MattW
                                Veterans List
                                • May 2011
                                • 4196

                                Originally posted by Ludwig
                                Jones deal is for an equivalent 23 or 24, I would say, valuing the future swap at around 200 points. That's fine. About the same as the Langdon deal.

                                We improved our draft position both this year and next/

                                I feel that Papley wasn't really all that keen to go. It was just some 'family' pressure. He loves the Swans.

                                And we can wait till next year for Daniher if we still want him. We can now play both Naismith and Sinclair, fitness willing, in the same side. It also helps sort out our KPP situation, where we've got a lot of players, but we can now buy time to see who is worth keeping and who is not.

                                My grade for the Swans trade period is an A.
                                It's 23 if we finish first and they finish 15th.

                                Agree though, good trade period.

                                - Set the right Daniher red line of pick 5 - Green or Serong.
                                - Didn't cave on Papley.
                                - Traded intelligently otherwise.

                                Comment

                                Working...