2020 trading, drafting and list management: players and personnel
Collapse
X
-
All opinions are not equal. Some are a very great deal more robust, sophisticated, and well supported in logic and argument than others. -Douglas Adams, author (11 Mar 1952-2001) -
I'm pretty sure I heard it on one of his pressers, so it will be on the Swans' website. Maybe someone else can confirm this.Comment
-
Matthew Lloyd believes Sydney must stop pursuit of Joe Daniher - Footy Classified | Footy on Nine - YouTubeLast edited by KSAS; 18 July 2020, 12:46 AM.Comment
-
Here is the FC segment from Wednesday night where Matthew Lloyd gives his Joe Daniher synopsis. I get the impression Lloyd might be hinting to Daniher that we won't able to manage his injuries any better by highlighting the injury list with our key forwards. He is still making out that we were chasing JD from the outset, when a well researched Jack Niall article clearly showed JD approached us first. I recall Lloyd being one of many pushing JD was worth 2 x top 10 picks (5 & 9) during last trade period, yet he still hasn't managed to play a game in 2 years! We would've lost Papley to get that trade done, who is now leading the Coleman & is AA bound! We managed to dodge a hail of bullets & not just one!
Matthew Lloyd believes Sydney must stop pursuit of Joe Daniher - Footy Classified | Footy on Nine - YouTubeComment
-
Yes, and under that scenario, we wouldn't have got pick 5, Stephens. Plus if Daniher was on the scene, we may have got rid of one of our young talls, like McLean or Amartey. And with increased salary cap pressure, probably also on the line, would have been a handy journeyman, like Fox, or a not quite in the best 22 youngster, like Stoddardt. All that to increase our already lengthy injury list.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
How could North's list be overrated? They need pick 2 even more than we do.
*****
We have to find a way to get in a good ruck. Although where to find the trade currency. And how much do we want to spend given the likelihood they will be injured much of the time anyway?All opinions are not equal. Some are a very great deal more robust, sophisticated, and well supported in logic and argument than others. -Douglas Adams, author (11 Mar 1952-2001)Comment
-
On the other hand, I agree completely that we need to get in a ruck who will be in peak form for our 2023 flag win, this thread took a bit of a look at the issue and discussed some options about 60 posts ago.Last edited by Ruck'n'Roll; 19 July 2020, 02:16 PM.Comment
-
If list sizes are cut, there should be a number of ruck prospects available as clubs are likely to cut their ruck number to 2, if they have enough tall utilities to fill the gaps.
I would still like to see how Amartey goes once he's injury free. He has the vertical leap to make up for his undersize for the position.Comment
-
Guys, I don’t want to criticise KB and his team, but have we received any (even 1) top player via trade or draft over the last few years? Maybe Mills, but we keep playing him in defence. They either haven’t developed or been injured- it’s like we’ve been jinxed! Other teams have done a lot better and I’m not convinced that our current list has the potential we all thought. Ollie is case in point- has some talent but so inconsistent! Frustrating to say the least. We’ve had a great run but there doesn’t seem to be much joy in the near future- we need to play like a team and learn to pass properly- is that too much to expect from AFL players? How I miss Buddy!Comment
Comment