2020 trading, drafting and list management: players and personnel

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • AB Swannie
    Senior Player
    • Mar 2017
    • 1579

    The question I still have unanswered is Ben Ronke? I really thought he’d get traded for a late pick but perhaps we are just awaiting a confirmation on TPP and list sizes before making the decision to delist or re-sign.

    Comment

    • AnnieH
      RWOs Black Sheep
      • Aug 2006
      • 11332

      Did we get a ruckman?
      How lovely.

      Big sad they let Aliir go.
      Wild speculation, unsubstantiated rumours, silly jokes and opposition delight in another's failures is what makes an internet forum fun.
      Blessed are the cracked for they are the ones who let in the light.

      Comment

      • Ralph Dawg
        Senior Player
        • Apr 2018
        • 1729

        Originally posted by AB Swannie
        The question I still have unanswered is Ben Ronke? I really thought he’d get traded for a late pick but perhaps we are just awaiting a confirmation on TPP and list sizes before making the decision to delist or re-sign.
        We are short on pressure small forwards. Papley, Wicks, Ronke and Foot are our only true smalls. With the way modern footy is played, we need to have at least 2 in our forward line to maintain pressure and help lock the ball in our forward 50. Too often it's just been Paps supplying that pressure with a bit of assistance from a non specialist mid or one of the mediums who lack that explosive footspeed that comes from a true small forward.

        Ronke in part has been a victim of his early success and at times I think judged unfairly. I felt his games this year we're much improved, in particular his forward pressure and also his delivery from half forward. I hope we keep him.

        Comment

        • 111431
          Regular in the Side
          • Sep 2010
          • 698

          Originally posted by Ralph Dawg
          We are short on pressure small forwards. Papley, Wicks, Ronke and Foot are our only true smalls. With the way modern footy is played, we need to have at least 2 in our forward line to maintain pressure and help lock the ball in our forward 50. Too often it's just been Paps supplying that pressure with a bit of assistance from a non specialist mid or one of the mediums who lack that explosive footspeed that comes from a true small forward.

          Ronke in part has been a victim of his early success and at times I think judged unfairly. I felt his games this year we're much improved, in particular his forward pressure and also his delivery from half forward. I hope we keep him.
          I would agree - i thought he was more than serviceable until injured

          Comment

          • Auntie.Gerald
            Veterans List
            • Oct 2009
            • 6480

            Do Grey and squizz Taylor count as small forwards ?
            "be tough, only when it gets tough"

            Comment

            • Thunder Shaker
              Aut vincere aut mori
              • Apr 2004
              • 4205

              Trade periods ranked from worst to best

              Collingwood 18th 1/10 ... That was woeful.
              Essendon 17th .. 4.5/10 ... Not all bad, surely? Three picks in the first 10?
              GWS 16th 5/10 ... Four first-round draft picks. Prising three first-round picks out of Geelong, and that's only good enough for 16th?

              Sydney 13th 5/10 ... Only downside was trading Aliir for slight unders, but Port were holding tightly on to draft points for Lachlan Jones (a top-10 prospect) so options were limited. We recruited a ruck, got several hundred draft points, and kept pick 3 and the first two 2021 picks.

              I won't post all of the club's trade ratings (the AFL does a better job explaining it than I can), but I have to say this. Be thankful we're not Collingwood.
              "Unbelievable!" -- Nick Davis leaves his mark on the 2005 semi final

              Comment

              • Ralph Dawg
                Senior Player
                • Apr 2018
                • 1729

                Originally posted by Auntie.Gerald
                Do Grey and squizz Taylor count as small forwards ?
                Sorry forgot about them, most probably reflects how much impact they had!

                To be fair, Squiz was ok in attack, not sure how much defensive pressure he provided though. Perhaps this side of his game will improve with improved conditioning?

                I was excited about Gray. Had seen him play some good ones for Port but for us, just looked a bit lost and struggled to get involved. If we could, I would axe him.

                Comment

                • Captain
                  Captain of the Side
                  • Feb 2004
                  • 3602

                  Any update on ET? Surely we have found a way to get out of his contract.

                  Comment

                  • aardvark
                    Veterans List
                    • Mar 2010
                    • 5685

                    Originally posted by Captain
                    Any update on ET? Surely we have found a way to get out of his contract.
                    Being sentenced on the 2nd December.

                    Comment

                    • Ludwig
                      Veterans List
                      • Apr 2007
                      • 9359

                      Originally posted by The Big Cat
                      North traded the scarecrow to Melbourne.


                      Originally posted by Ralph Dawg
                      We are short on pressure small forwards. Papley, Wicks, Ronke and Foot are our only true smalls. With the way modern footy is played, we need to have at least 2 in our forward line to maintain pressure and help lock the ball in our forward 50. Too often it's just been Paps supplying that pressure with a bit of assistance from a non specialist mid or one of the mediums who lack that explosive footspeed that comes from a true small forward.

                      Ronke in part has been a victim of his early success and at times I think judged unfairly. I felt his games this year we're much improved, in particular his forward pressure and also his delivery from half forward. I hope we keep him.
                      Agree about Ronke. I made similar remarks as well. I thought he was a good candidate for trade. I think we could have gotten something for him, so don't think he would be delisted now, but rookie listing is not out of the question.

                      I feel we can produce good forward pressure next year. Even our key forwards, Buddy and Reid, apply good pressure for KPFs. Heeney applies pressure well and Hayward is much improved in this regard. I think as unit, it should be okay.

                      The Swans are transitioning from a defensive to a forward half team; at least that's what we're trying to do. I'm worried about lingering effects from injuries to Buddy, Heeney. Hewett and Ronke. We need to keep our better players fit next year to make the ladder improvement we hope for, else it could be another development year.

                      Comment

                      • Ludwig
                        Veterans List
                        • Apr 2007
                        • 9359

                        Originally posted by aardvark
                        Being sentenced on the 2nd December.
                        Regardless of the sentence, he pleaded guilty to a violent crime. I think that should be enough to get sacked. He's a 2 time offender in his first year. We usually don't tolerate far less than that kind of off field behaviour. Violence against women is especially over the limit of what should be acceptible.

                        Comment

                        • aardvark
                          Veterans List
                          • Mar 2010
                          • 5685

                          Originally posted by Ludwig
                          Regardless of the sentence, he pleaded guilty to a violent crime. I think that should be enough to get sacked. He's a 2 time offender in his first year. We usually don't tolerate far less than that kind of off field behaviour. Violence against women is especially over the limit of what should be acceptible.
                          I'm guessing the AFL will have a big say in whether or not he gets deregistered. Would we be required to pay out his contract if we delist him? Maybe if the AFL deregisters him we won't be required to pay him out. Who knows?

                          Comment

                          • aardvark
                            Veterans List
                            • Mar 2010
                            • 5685

                            Originally posted by Ludwig
                            Regardless of the sentence, he pleaded guilty to a violent crime. I think that should be enough to get sacked. He's a 2 time offender in his first year. We usually don't tolerate far less than that kind of off field behaviour. Violence against women is especially over the limit of what should be acceptible.
                            I'm guessing the AFL will have a big say in whether or not he gets deregistered. Would we be required to pay out his contract if we delist him? Maybe if the AFL deregisters him we won't be required to pay him out. Who knows?

                            Comment

                            • waswan
                              Senior Player
                              • Oct 2015
                              • 2047

                              Originally posted by Ludwig
                              Regardless of the sentence, he pleaded guilty to a violent crime. I think that should be enough to get sacked. He's a 2 time offender in his first year. We usually don't tolerate far less than that kind of off field behaviour. Violence against women is especially over the limit of what should be acceptible.
                              But did he sleep in for training

                              Comment

                              • bloodspirit
                                Clubman
                                • Apr 2015
                                • 4448

                                RE: ET

                                I feel confident we can terminate his contract and de-list him if we want to, regardless of what happens when he is sentenced. If we do that, I wouldn't think we would have to pay him out anything but possibly we would do so just to avoid legal proceedings and protracting the matter. I don't think we would have to include his salary in our cap if we terminate and delist him - although possibly that will depend on whether we do that after list numbers for 2021 have been finalised. I think the next court date is fortunately happening just before the ND. Hopefully he will be sentenced and the matter finalised on that date. Then, hopefully, we will make a call about what we are doing about ET before the ND and definitely before our 2021 list is finalised. I don't think it's out of the question that we will keep him. That decision could be taken out of our hands if he is sentenced to gaol and maybe that's why we're delaying our decision.
                                All opinions are not equal. Some are a very great deal more robust, sophisticated, and well supported in logic and argument than others. -Douglas Adams, author (11 Mar 1952-2001)

                                Comment

                                Working...