2021 trading, drafting and list management: players and personnel

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Captain
    Captain of the Side
    • Feb 2004
    • 3602

    If Parker and Hewett do go, we still have a good midfield. Would mean Heeney needs to get off a half forward flank and play on ball.

    Mills, Warner, Heeney as our starting 3 and then JPK, Rowbottom, McInerney, Papley also rotating through.

    Would also be good to see Gulden and Campbell get more time on ball.

    Future would still look bright. We are nothing like Collingwood!

    Comment

    • royboy42
      Senior Player
      • Apr 2006
      • 2076

      Post season ramblings always remind me of in game commentary on RWO.
      Nothing said by the club.
      No one really knows what's going to happen next.
      Outside commentators full of it, forecasts and all.
      And lots of" It old you so's "after the event.
      Fun to watch.

      Comment

      • i'm-uninformed2
        Reefer Madness
        • Oct 2003
        • 4653

        Originally posted by Ralph Dawg
        Better sign up Parker ASAP. Neale apparently wants back to Freo, Lions will be looking for a replacement and will be armed with a bucket of cash. If I was Fagan, Parker would be the first guy I call. Perfect replacement for Neale, both in style and culturally.
        Every year there are a couple of big moves that unlock a lot else. If Neale was on the move, that’d be one of them as Brisbane are in the window and won’t just be wanting draft picks. Not saying it’s Parker; it could be one of the Hawks mids given the Dorks want draft picks.

        As for the Swans, I ain’t jumping at shadows just yet. I don’t doubt our cap is tight. But, we’re traditionally a club that airs very little and it may be as simple as we’re waiting for the new CBA to be signed before making final decisions and offers.

        Take Parker for example. I’d be stunned if the $550K for two years offer was true. It’s more likely the argument is still over the fourth year and the total price across the contract. The difference between a total salary cap of say, $13.1m and $12.7m is massive for settling that.
        'Delicious' is a fun word to say

        Comment

        • AB Swannie
          Senior Player
          • Mar 2017
          • 1579

          Originally posted by mcs
          For a long while now we have always taken plenty of time to make post-season list changes, so I don't think it is particularly unusual compared to any other year.
          I think this is largely true for delistings but I don't remember us being this tardy for re-signings of players in the ilk of Parker or Dawson or even, for that matter, a high draft pick like Stephens. If, indeed, we are waiting for the CBA to be finalised, it would be nice if the club actually said that.

          For the record, I actually am still confident that we re-sign Parker, Dawson, and Stephens.

          Comment

          • barry
            Veterans List
            • Jan 2003
            • 8499

            Originally posted by i'm-uninformed2

            Take Parker for example. I’d be stunned if the $550K for two years offer was true. It’s more likely the argument is still over the fourth year and the total price across the contract. The difference between a total salary cap of say, $13.1m and $12.7m is massive for settling that.
            how does that work for contracts. Is a player on, say, $500,000 exactly, or ~4% of the salary cap, and so as cap changes, the $ value changes. ?
            If not, changing the cap each year must be a disaster for cap management.

            Comment

            • 707
              Veterans List
              • Aug 2009
              • 6204

              No announcement from the AFL on next years TPP so clubs are being cautious and waiting until they have a definite fugure to work with.

              There really are some almost hysterical posts on here about mismanagement of our TPP. How about we don't take the media click bait and just wait and see what is happening. Trade period is still weeks away and the TPP will need to be announced before then.

              The club doesn't have to, nor has it ever to my knowledge commented on the state of our salary cap. The only clubs that do comment are bottom dwellers boasting about having "war chests" to poach players.

              Comment

              • i'm-uninformed2
                Reefer Madness
                • Oct 2003
                • 4653

                Originally posted by barry
                how does that work for contracts. Is a player on, say, $500,000 exactly, or ~4% of the salary cap, and so as cap changes, the $ value changes. ?
                If not, changing the cap each year must be a disaster for cap management.
                The cap tends to get reset every five or six years to give clubs a long-life view of what they are working with.
                'Delicious' is a fun word to say

                Comment

                • 111431
                  Regular in the Side
                  • Sep 2010
                  • 697

                  I heard Tom Petroro (one of the player agents) interviewed yesterday. Apparently, the pay cut players took last year has to be absorbed in this year's salary cap. He mentioned a figure of approx $700K on average per club. The impact of that, plus the unknown salary cap figure, must make it difficult for the clubs to be planning their player contracts for the future. I wouldn't be panicking about our situation just yet.

                  Comment

                  • Aprilbr
                    Senior Player
                    • Oct 2016
                    • 1803

                    Originally posted by Ralph Dawg
                    Better sign up Parker ASAP. Neale apparently wants back to Freo, Lions will be looking for a replacement and will be armed with a bucket of cash. If I was Fagan, Parker would be the first guy I call. Perfect replacement for Neale, both in style and culturally.
                    I was thinking of the same thing, Ralph, when I heard this stunning news from Brisbane. For the first time, I think we are a real chance to lose Parker as they will potentially have the money, need and attraction for him to make the move. He would also be moving to a Club that is in its premiership window. We desperately need to find the money now to keep him. Mind you it will be hard for Freo to get that deal done as Neal still has 2 years left on his contract and Brisbane will want a lot for him.

                    Comment

                    • Nico
                      Veterans List
                      • Jan 2003
                      • 11329

                      Originally posted by Ralph Dawg
                      Better sign up Parker ASAP. Neale apparently wants back to Freo, Lions will be looking for a replacement and will be armed with a bucket of cash. If I was Fagan, Parker would be the first guy I call. Perfect replacement for Neale, both in style and culturally.
                      Neale has played 3 years of a 5 year contract and he and his partner want to go back to Perth. Talk about a mercenary. Probably reckons he is worth more Laurie Nash now. If I was Brisbane I would be nailing Freo to the cross on this one and extracting as much blood as they can. If Cerra has half a brain he would be going to Brisbane rather than the perennial rabble he is supposedly connected to.
                      http://www.nostalgiamusic.co.uk/secu...res/srh806.jpg

                      Comment

                      • Aprilbr
                        Senior Player
                        • Oct 2016
                        • 1803

                        Yes, there is a lot of water to go under the bridge in the potential Neale deal. Apparently, Brisbane are totally in the dark over these reports which is pretty poor if true. If you want to leave at least have the guts to first tell your Club face-to-face. Brisbane have given him an excellent deal, a strong team to play in and they gave up a lot of draft picks to get him. They deserve better.

                        Comment

                        • waswan
                          Senior Player
                          • Oct 2015
                          • 2047

                          Neales issue is his current deal has him coming out of his contract at 30.
                          That is no mans land or more importantly the land of the 1yr deal

                          Comment

                          • Aprilbr
                            Senior Player
                            • Oct 2016
                            • 1803

                            They are already saying on SEN that Parker is now in play given it unearths a potential cashed-up suitor who is in their premiership window. Another potential name in the mix is Tom Mitchell. Hawks will trade him if they could get a good pick back. For Brisbane, Parker would be easier to get as he is an unrestricted free agent. They would pick up an early pick (number 6) and then bring in Parker to replace Neale. If we lose Parker to Brisbane as a free agent then I assume that we would receive a first round draft selection for him much like Essendon did for Daniher last season?

                            Comment

                            • i'm-uninformed2
                              Reefer Madness
                              • Oct 2003
                              • 4653

                              Before we get all spooky re Brisbane chasing Parker, let's understand how difficult it'll be for Neale to get home.

                              A) He has only one club to go to, Freo, given WCE have no capacity to trade for him, or pay his salary right now. WCE apparently did a deal with their players last year saying please take the COVID pay cut, and in return, we won't go chasing a big name player.
                              B) Freo are looking at a 29yo with one option in the west. Brilliant player, but still. They are building a young list, and won't be throwing away the farm for Neale.
                              C) That gives them a whip hand in negotiations, and no need to offer anything spectacular for him.
                              D) Brisbane are in a window, have him under contract and will want something special in return.

                              I can see this playing out like the Papley/Daniher one - where the gap between the main clubs involved in what they want vs what they are willing to offer being a barrier.
                              'Delicious' is a fun word to say

                              Comment

                              • 707
                                Veterans List
                                • Aug 2009
                                • 6204

                                Originally posted by Aprilbr
                                They are already saying on SEN that Parker is now in play given it unearths a potential cashed-up suitor who is in their premiership window. Another potential name in the mix is Tom Mitchell. Hawks will trade him if they could get a good pick back. For Brisbane, Parker would be easier to get as he is an unrestricted free agent. They would pick up an early pick (number 6) and then bring in Parker to replace Neale. If we lose Parker to Brisbane as a free agent then I assume that we would receive a first round draft selection for him much like Essendon did for Daniher last season?
                                That would be pick 13 which will actually be pick 15 after 2 x F/S. Would you trade Parker for pick 15? What would SEN being chatting about if they didn't spend their time seizing on every unsigned player as "in play" to be going elsewhere? Happens every year and in the end most of their "in plays" re-sign where they are. Players don't leave teams in the Premiership window too often.

                                We are not orphans in tight cap space. The top 9-12 clubs, plus 17th placed Pies will have very little cap space this year.

                                We do have Buddy dropping $600k in 2022 although that may already have been spent in back ending contracts in previous years.

                                Trust the club to keep the band together, do not absorb media chat as gospel, it's not worth worrying about at this point in time.

                                Comment

                                Working...