2021 trading, drafting and list management: players and personnel
Collapse
X
-
-
Wonder though what the retention of him and Amarty says for Reid?'Delicious' is a fun word to sayComment
-
Good. I like McLean. He’ll never be a superstar, but a good, solid, depth player and if things go well, can play a post Buddy forward line role. Importantly, a big body to take pressure of McDonald while he develops.
Wonder though what the retention of him and Amarty says for Reid?Comment
-
If that's the Ralph article, he billed it as explaining 'why the Swans have more cap space than predicted': Jon Ralph on Twitter: "Chol’s landing spot, CCJ’s decision, McLean to stay at Swans, Davis to go again, why the Swans have more cap space than predicted, how Tom Mitchell to Port makes so much sense, Roos offers to vets, Stack to get 1 year. Heaps of new stuff in the trade wrap https://t.co/bpYZRFrsat". Is that an inference drawn from our apparent interest in a player or is there something substantive to it?
I’m trying to stay positive that we aren’t in a Collingwood like position and are not salary dumping anyone*
* except poor GeorgeComment
-
Says Carlton offering George $450k a year for four years. I like George, but that’s slight overs for me.'Delicious' is a fun word to sayComment
-
The more they pay for him and the longer the contract the better it is for us. This is because the secret herbs and spices recipe for determining compensation for restricted free agents takes these types of factors into account.Comment
-
You know that your player is going to Carlton, when; they rapidly change the screen that they're viewing, and you later find out, that it wasn't porn, but a tutorial entitled, "Cardboard boxes and their role in civilisation".Comment
-
Dawson was a key piece in our climb towards a premiership, wicks and McLean will play zero role in that.Those who have the greatest power to hurt us are those we love.Comment
-
What are you on about , nether are stars but that is harsh . Even it they are depth you need DEPTH to win a flag !Comment
-
You can’t have too many mids. Have a look at the Bulldogs, they already had one of the top midfields in the league and they went an added Treloar
It concerns me that our list managers don’t seem to subscribe to this theory, particularly when Josh is heading into what will surely be his final season
That is certainly true for the Swans, although oft neglected on RWO.Comment
-
You can’t have too many mids. Have a look at the Bulldogs, they already had one of the top midfields in the league and they went an added Treloar
It concerns me that our list managers don’t seem to subscribe to this theory, particularly when Josh is heading into what will surely be his final season
In 24/25, we will have Parker, Mills, Warner, Rowbottom, Gulden, JMac, maybe Campbell, Heeney at times, Stephens if he stays and develops, Florent if he doesn’t get overtaken and improves, and whatever else we add between now and then.
I like George and in an ideal world he stays, but we need to make choices to build a flag ready list.'Delicious' is a fun word to sayComment
-
True, but maybe the coaches have a view of when our list will mature to be truly competing and are planning accordingly. As in, when will our young brigade be fully developed, and when will McDonald or other KPPs be ready.
In 24/25, we will have Parker, Mills, Warner, Rowbottom, Gulden, JMac, maybe Campbell, Heeney at times, Stephens if he stays and develops, Florent if he doesn’t get overtaken and improves, and whatever else we add between now and then.
I like George and in an ideal world he stays, but we need to make choices to build a flag ready list.Comment
-
As Dawson just showed, that's absolutely a risk. But the club have to back themselves to keep as many as possible.
As I said, I like George and would ideally keep him. But something has to give. Now, not wanting to pick on an individual player, but if you gave me a choice between George and Florent, for example, I'd keep George. But George is on the wrong end of the musical chairs it seems.'Delicious' is a fun word to sayComment
-
They clearly don't rate Hewett. Not only did he not get a contract, but I don't think he was in the top 10 for the B&F either. I'd guess likely related to him being not compatible with our game plan that requires speed and elite skills.
On Dawson, I'd be asking for Jordon Butts from the crows in a straight swap.Comment
-
I'm not sure its that they don't rate him. I think its more that in the pecking order of re-signings he was much lower down the list perhaps due to likely cost v potential contribution going forward? They knew they could not keep all of their priorities so we was the one to be sacrificed. Of course, we did not bank on losing Dawson.Comment
Comment