2023 List Management

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Captain
    Captain of the Side
    • Feb 2004
    • 3602

    Originally posted by Roadrunner
    Happy about Sammy- hopefully he can stay reasonably fit next year. Regarding Wicks: I’ve been a big critic as I don’t think he contributes enough, however the club obviously sees it differently to give him another year. Hope he replays the faith but I would have let him go, as he’s not first 22 and there are youngsters needing game time.
    Konstanty had a shocking year (form and injuries) and was/is the main one to knock him out. At this stage Wicks is well ahead of him and Konstanty is so far off deserving a place in the seniors.

    Let’s see how the year plays out and who performs better.

    Comment

    • Maltopia
      Senior Player
      • Apr 2016
      • 1556

      It seems bizarre to me that the club played Clarke as sub so many times when they were probably sure they were going to delist him.

      We have had form with keeping players in the 2s that we were not going to keep for next year (R O’Keefe?).

      Surely we would have been better playing Warner jnr a few more times or try HKH etc, when they were thereabouts at the top 23-24 level (amongst fit players).

      Not talking about gifting games to players way off the pace, but it seems like we wasted some opportunities in the second half of the season to develop our list.

      Comment

      • 0918330512
        Senior Player
        • Sep 2011
        • 1654

        Wonder what the chances of someone else drafting Reid ahead of us in the Rookie draft might be ????

        Comment

        • Auntie.Gerald
          Veterans List
          • Oct 2009
          • 6474

          1 in 18
          "be tough, only when it gets tough"

          Comment

          • lwjoyner
            Regular in the Side
            • Nov 2004
            • 942

            will we still draft o murphy is he is still available. i hope we do.

            Comment

            • stevoswan
              Veterans List
              • Sep 2014
              • 8543

              Originally posted by 0918330512
              Wonder what the chances of someone else drafting Reid ahead of us in the Rookie draft might be ????
              I had the same thought.....it would be a long shot given his injury history but not totally out of the question, given his pedigree when fit, which some will assume he is now.

              Comment

              • Roadrunner
                Senior Player
                • Jan 2018
                • 1445

                Originally posted by Captain
                Konstanty had a shocking year (form and injuries) and was/is the main one to knock him out. At this stage Wicks is well ahead of him and Konstanty is so far off deserving a place in the seniors.

                Let’s see how the year plays out and who performs better.
                Warner Jnr and Roberts come to mind and maybe some others that could be worth a try. My point is that we know Wick’s upside as he’s played 50 games now. There don’t seem to be any other spots in the team unless you’re a competent KPD, so Wicks is vulnerable. We need better to help make top 4- too many brain farts for mine.

                Comment

                • BRS328
                  Warming the Bench
                  • Feb 2018
                  • 343

                  BRS328

                  This is an interesting question on the adding Sam Reid onto the rookie list. If I recall correctly we did the same thing two years ago when we added Paddy McCartin to the rookie list having played in the VFL team the previous year.

                  Like you I was, and still am, under the impression the rookie draft followed the same format as the National draft, but there appears to be a way around this with current listed players being shuffled between primary and rookie lists without risk.

                  I would like to refer this one to Liz who seems to have a better understanding of how this works.

                  Comment

                  • Auntie.Gerald
                    Veterans List
                    • Oct 2009
                    • 6474

                    I’m not nervous on the rookie move by the club for Reid

                    Sam will simply let his manager know that it is Swans or no deal

                    Simples

                    Every club tends to toe the line on allowing shuffles between rookie and list and vica versa
                    "be tough, only when it gets tough"

                    Comment

                    • Captain
                      Captain of the Side
                      • Feb 2004
                      • 3602

                      Originally posted by BRS328
                      This is an interesting question on the adding Sam Reid onto the rookie list. If I recall correctly we did the same thing two years ago when we added Paddy McCartin to the rookie list having played in the VFL team the previous year.

                      Like you I was, and still am, under the impression the rookie draft followed the same format as the National draft, but there appears to be a way around this with current listed players being shuffled between primary and rookie lists without risk.

                      I would like to refer this one to Liz who seems to have a better understanding of how this works.
                      Think it's reasonably straight forward.

                      We delist Reid, he nominates for the rookie draft and anyone can pick him up (works no different to national draft). Clearly it wouldn't make sense for another club to take him as he would simply retire and they would waste a pick when they could have drafted a younger player. Of course it's not guaranteed that this wouldn't happen but a club would be very vindictive and stupid to do so.

                      Comment

                      • BRS328
                        Warming the Bench
                        • Feb 2018
                        • 343

                        AG. Isn’t that draft tampering?

                        Comment

                        • Blood Fever
                          Veterans List
                          • Apr 2007
                          • 4040

                          Originally posted by Captain
                          Konstanty had a shocking year (form and injuries) and was/is the main one to knock him out. At this stage Wicks is well ahead of him and Konstanty is so far off deserving a place in the seniors.

                          Let’s see how the year plays out and who performs better.
                          Konstanty is 18 and only turns 19 next week. Fair bit of upside i would have thought.

                          Comment

                          • Captain
                            Captain of the Side
                            • Feb 2004
                            • 3602

                            Originally posted by Blood Fever
                            Konstanty is 18 and only turns 19 next week. Fair bit of upside i would have thought.
                            Never said there wasn't.

                            If you read what I wrote, it was in relation to why I think we kept Wicks for 2024 (not the next 10 years). Konstanty didn't show enough this year to give confidence he will be able to (or ready to) take over from Wicks next year.

                            Comment

                            • Blood Fever
                              Veterans List
                              • Apr 2007
                              • 4040

                              It wasn't a criticism, just an observation.

                              Comment

                              • rb4x
                                Regular in the Side
                                • Dec 2007
                                • 968

                                The purpose of the rookie draft was to give rookies (newbies) a chance to get onto an AFL list with less risk to the club taking the chance and drafting them as they could be given a one year contract at a lower base than the AFL draft. Placing Sam Reid on the rookie list is an abuse of this process in my opinion as he is the most senior player an the Swans list. If they do this I will be extremely disappointed in the Swans for gaming the system. Sam should either be retained on the senior list or given the opportunity to retire.

                                Comment

                                Working...