Why Hall Why????

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • CJK
    Human
    • Apr 2006
    • 2170

    MORAL OUTRAGE!!!11 !!one!!!!
    -

    Comment

    • stellation
      scott names the planets
      • Sep 2003
      • 9718

      Originally posted by liz
      Maybe part of his punishment should be going round to as many Auskick clinics as he can get to in the next 8 weeks and tell them himself that what he did was stupid.
      An excellent idea, although the magoos might be a bit annoyed that he is stepping on their turf by actually going out and talking to kids
      I knew him as a gentle young man, I cannot say for sure the reasons for his decline
      We watched him fade before our very eyes, and years before his time

      Comment

      • TheHood
        On the Rookie List
        • Jan 2003
        • 1938

        The AusKick idea is a good one. It should happen.

        Cheekily and in jest only, I can't help but think that Barry was put up to it by the AFL to show those out West how tough AFL is and any crook act the NRL can do, the Ping Pong boys can do better (a look-away slug to the chin).

        Yes and personally, he might as well have clocked me on the chin because I was gob smacked anyway. We can't even console ourselved that "oh well it was a dirty night anyway". It was a terrific night with hope and momentum aplenty for the R&Ws.

        It was a quick brain fade from a very aggressive player, he will be back in 6 weeks and Barry better hope his absence isn't felt on the League Ladder, then disappointments will convert to sheer anger.
        The Pain of Discipline is Nothing Like The Pain of Disappointment

        Comment

        • dimelb
          pr. dim-melb; m not f
          • Jun 2003
          • 6889

          Originally posted by Legs Akimbo
          You did not read the post properly. I am not justifying what he did. In fact, I deliberately started my post by saying it is not a mitigating factor. I am merely seeking to understand what might have caused what is a despicable act by Hall.

          I am raising a secondary issue, which is that the umpire was watching Hall being infringed and deliberately ignored it. After this going on for so many years, I think it was this that made Hall snap. He was filthy abut it, reached the end of his tether, snapped. Grossly selfish and undisciplined, but the umpire, whoever it was, in some way contributed to the outcome by inciting it.
          Agree with this. It is a reason, not an excuse, and I saw it the same way. I suspect his gesture after Staker went down said, in effect, 'What am I supposed to do?' The answer is, "Keep your cool' but why did the umpire not act? We see frees all the time for much less than the antics Staker was getting up to. And the word 'antics' does not justify Hall's action.
          He reminds him of the guys, close-set, slow, and never rattled, who were play-makers on the team. (John Updike, seeing Josh Kennedy in a crystal ball)

          Comment

          • CureTheSane
            Carpe Noctem
            • Jan 2003
            • 5032

            All this has absolutely nothing to do with Auskick, nor should it.

            Seriously, if the kids at Auskick don't know that what Hall did was wrong, then the ones to be held responsible are their parents.

            If anything this is a GOOD thing for the kids at Auskick.
            They will see the consequences of such actions and the public apologies and embarrassment that go along with it.
            Biggest deterrent (and lesson) ever.
            The difference between insanity and genius is measured only in success.

            Comment

            • Zlatorog
              Senior Player
              • Jan 2006
              • 1748

              CTS, I think you're missing the point here. If Barry is considered to be a hero here, the youngsters are in no ability to make judgement in whether Barry's action was good or bad. Their parent aren't good at that judgement either.

              Comment

              • stellation
                scott names the planets
                • Sep 2003
                • 9718

                Originally posted by CureTheSane
                All this has absolutely nothing to do with Auskick, nor should it.

                Seriously, if the kids at Auskick don't know that what Hall did was wrong, then the ones to be held responsible are their parents.

                If anything this is a GOOD thing for the kids at Auskick.
                They will see the consequences of such actions and the public apologies and embarrassment that go along with it.
                Biggest deterrent (and lesson) ever.
                Every kid this morning knew he did the wrong thing, so you can't fault their parents, but they still thought it was really, really cool.
                I knew him as a gentle young man, I cannot say for sure the reasons for his decline
                We watched him fade before our very eyes, and years before his time

                Comment

                • CJK
                  Human
                  • Apr 2006
                  • 2170

                  Won't someone please think of the children!!

                  (helen lovejoy, simpsons)

                  -

                  Comment

                  • D54
                    the almighty believes
                    • Jul 2007
                    • 22

                    Originally posted by DeadlyAkkuret
                    Not the Ch10 I was watching. They kept showing the initial shrugging off but stopped short of the "king hit". Maybe the coverage here in the west was just bad?
                    if i cared enough i could bring up about 10 replays from ch 10 recordings that are on my PC's hard drive, but i dnt so yeah ch 10 barely showed it. I hope ch 7 can get some exclusive footage so we can actually see this elusive footage.

                    PS only 'the 5th quarter' did the cut-off, and 2 seconds later they showed the incident in full so it was a tech error. In addition to that, quarterz said "alright this is the last time we can show this..." after the game but before 'the 5th quarter'...so u kno that ch 10 showed it a bunch of times throughout.
                    Last edited by D54; 13 April 2008, 04:55 PM.
                    Mickey'O 34 Goals 17 Behinds (66%) 10 Goal assists
                    Club Games Record Holder

                    Comment

                    • D54
                      the almighty believes
                      • Jul 2007
                      • 22

                      Originally posted by TheGrimReaper
                      the bull@@@@ would never have happened.
                      If he decided not to be so @@@@@ing stupid it wouldnt have happened, and i wouldnt read these weak cop-outs.
                      Last edited by NMWBloods; 13 April 2008, 05:55 PM. Reason: Personal abuse
                      Mickey'O 34 Goals 17 Behinds (66%) 10 Goal assists
                      Club Games Record Holder

                      Comment

                      • CureTheSane
                        Carpe Noctem
                        • Jan 2003
                        • 5032

                        Originally posted by Zlatorog
                        CTS, I think you're missing the point here. If Barry is considered to be a hero here, the youngsters are in no ability to make judgement in whether Barry's action was good or bad. Their parent aren't good at that judgement either.
                        Nope I get the point 1000% I just don't agree with it.
                        It's a whole different topic.
                        "Should AFL players be considered role models or are they simply sportsmen who are unfairly thrust into that position?"
                        Been there, done that, and "most people vs me" agree to disagree.

                        Point is, you can't go making chats to kids a part of a punishment.
                        The difference between insanity and genius is measured only in success.

                        Comment

                        • Bloody Hell
                          Senior Player
                          • Oct 2006
                          • 3085

                          Originally posted by CureTheSane
                          Nope I get the point 1000% I just don't agree with it.
                          It's a whole different topic.
                          "Should AFL players be considered role models or are they simply sportsmen who are unfairly thrust into that position?"
                          Been there, done that, and "most people vs me" agree to disagree.

                          Point is, you can't go making chats to kids a part of a punishment.
                          They're role models - whether they want to be or not. This is why the AFL comes down so heavily on off field discretions.

                          Barry Hall is a big brute of a man, but noone here would say he isn't intelligent. As someone else has stated alot of money has been put into his image. He knows it was stupid, he knows the impact.
                          Last edited by Bloody Hell; 13 April 2008, 05:20 PM.
                          The eternal connundrum "what happens when an unstoppable force meets an immovable object" was finally solved when David Hasselhoff punched himself in the face.

                          Comment

                          • stellation
                            scott names the planets
                            • Sep 2003
                            • 9718

                            Originally posted by CureTheSane
                            Nope I get the point 1000% I just don't agree with it.
                            It's a whole different topic.
                            "Should AFL players be considered role models or are they simply sportsmen who are unfairly thrust into that position?"
                            Been there, done that, and "most people vs me" agree to disagree.

                            Point is, you can't go making chats to kids a part of a punishment.
                            Keep in mind that it was an on-field discretion, not an off-field one. I agree with not holding them up for off-field actions, but they do need to be mindful of on-field ones.
                            I knew him as a gentle young man, I cannot say for sure the reasons for his decline
                            We watched him fade before our very eyes, and years before his time

                            Comment

                            • Old Royboy
                              Support Staff
                              • Mar 2004
                              • 879

                              The irony with all this is that there is a very good answer to why. That brainsnap and perfect punch has increased Hall's purse for his first professional boxing match by many thousands. Boxing promoters all over the country are seeing dollar signs.

                              It's a sad world when an act of thuggery like that ends up profiting the perpetrator. But I reckon that will happen.
                              Pay peanuts get monkeys

                              Comment

                              • ROK Lobster
                                RWO Life Member
                                • Aug 2004
                                • 8658

                                Originally posted by Old Royboy
                                It's a sad world when an act of thuggery like that ends up profiting the perpetrator. But I reckon that will happen.
                                That's the whole sport of boxing though, isn't it?

                                Comment

                                Working...