Bevan: How long has he got?
Collapse
X
-
The eternal connundrum "what happens when an unstoppable force meets an immovable object" was finally solved when David Hasselhoff punched himself in the face. -
Comment
-
Comment
-
Oh really, enough with the absurdity - two shots from near the boundary line and one over the shoulder, and all about 40m out is hardly "taken apart". And yet strangely, you think having four goals kicked on you in a quarter is fine.Last edited by Lohengrin; 12 May 2009, 08:57 PM.Comment
-
Considering we are picking our best 22 from a pool of 29 rather than 38 Bev is in the 22. He goes hard at it, that's good enuf for me
Paul Roos for PMComment
-
Can't be bothered quoting, because it's been brought up numerous times, but to those, particularly Connolly, who defend Bevo by saying that he never stopped trying, I couldn't agree more that he never stopped trying, but that doesn't make his game any less of a shocker. Credit to his character (which I've never doubted), but that doesn't change the fact that his performance was horrible.
I like Bevo as a player, I reckon he's definitely in our best 22 (wasn't so sure at the start of last year, in fact I admit I remember calling for his head), and the fact that he never gives up is a big reason for that, but he had an absolute shocker against Geelong, and there is absolutely no denying that. He isn't the reason we lost. It doesn't make him a dud player. Even superstars have shockers occasionally. He'll move on from it, and so should we, but there's no use making excuses for him.Officially on the Reid and Sumner bandwagon!Comment
-
Well why was Bolton moved off Johnston at the 20 minute mark of the first quarter? While the thinking music is playing perhaps you can also consider that Bevo was moved onto a bigger opponent who was in red hot form after pantsing the captain and our number one defender. Bevan did not have four goals kicked on him in a quarter. One goal by Stokes which he is being held responsible occured while he was playing on the forward line!Bevo bandwagon driverComment
-
Can't be bothered quoting, because it's been brought up numerous times, but to those, particularly Connolly, who defend Bevo by saying that he never stopped trying, I couldn't agree more that he never stopped trying, but that doesn't make his game any less of a shocker. Credit to his character (which I've never doubted), but that doesn't change the fact that his performance was horrible.
I like Bevo as a player, I reckon he's definitely in our best 22 (wasn't so sure at the start of last year, in fact I admit I remember calling for his head), and the fact that he never gives up is a big reason for that, but he had an absolute shocker against Geelong, and there is absolutely no denying that. He isn't the reason we lost. It doesn't make him a dud player. Even superstars have shockers occasionally. He'll move on from it, and so should we, but there's no use making excuses for him.Bevo bandwagon driverComment
-
Well why was Bolton moved off Johnston at the 20 minute mark of the first quarter? While the thinking music is playing perhaps you can also consider that Bevo was moved onto a bigger opponent who was in red hot form after pantsing the captain and our number one defender. Bevan did not have four goals kicked on him in a quarter. One goal by Stokes which he is being held responsible occured while he was playing on the forward line!
Bevan was on Stokes for all 3 of his goals. Quite clearly in the vision you can see Bevan near him in each case.Comment
-
I am not making excuses he was beaten on a number of occasions. I do object to the perjorative of "shocker". The real shockers were played by those players that went missing or turned it up after the Cats got on top in the second quarter and were beaten pointless in contested possessions. I think we know who they were.
2. A shocker is a shocker. Regardless of how hard he tried he had an absolute dog of a day. I think it is far enough to call it a shocker.Comment
-
I am not making excuses he was beaten on a number of occasions. I do object to the perjorative of "shocker". The real shockers were played by those players that went missing or turned it up after the Cats got on top in the second quarter and were beaten pointless in contested possessions. I think we know who they were.Does God believe in Atheists?Comment
-
One Johnston goal came directly from a Bolton mistake. Stokes beat Bolton for one of his goals and one came from a turnover from a Bevo pass where no one had dropped back to cover Stokes. If a defender goes forward you would expect your team mates to pick up a loose man.Bevo bandwagon driverComment
-
actually i don't think that is quite right - bevan sought to pass to jolly and stokes was chasing bevan but ran past him and when the ball spilled (because bevan sought to pass the ball to the centre circles to jolly with three geelong players within 5 metres - which we have already done and you and i have different views about) was still running towards goal while bevan was (perhaps justifiably) ball watching or running to where he kicked it (which is also perhaps justifiable) - by the time bevan turned stokes had 15 metres on him and he wasn't going to get that back.Comment
-
Can someone start "The Connolly is right and everyone else is wrong thread" please? We need somewhere where he can post all day about how great Bevan is and give the rest of us some peace.
Seriously, 13 @@@@ing pages of what???? Haven't you all learnt by now arguing with Connolly is like trying to reason with a screaming 4yo with ADD in the lollies section of Woollies as to why he/she can't have a can of Red Bull and a Mars bar??? Sure you need to teach the child but in the end, a slap on the ass is the only real solution. He's NEVER EVER going to admit that Bevo had a shocker even if everyone else agrees that Bevo is a gutsy player and deserves his spot in the team. It's beyond his capability of reasoning.
Get over it, move on.Comment
Comment