Mega merged trading thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Bleed Red Blood
    Senior Player
    • Sep 2003
    • 2057

    Originally posted by robamiee
    They are reporting of a possible direct swap Seaby for Surgen (not sure if spelt correctly)
    Jacob Surjan.

    What the. What do we need him for? I don't think he's even been getting a regular game at Port. Scuse a sec while I look up his stats. Yep, 8 games this year. Great... We give them a first ruck, and we get some sort of on-baller that we have an abundance of (I.e not exactly quick, not extraordinary disposal) Only gets ten touches a game. Maybe he's been playing as a tagger? Well we already have Jack, Bird, Smith, Shaw, doing those sorts of 'roles'.

    Comment

    • robamiee
      Regular in the Side
      • Sep 2005
      • 688

      i thought he was on the outer at Port due to ongoing issues with Motlop??

      Comment

      • Melbourne_Blood
        Senior Player
        • May 2010
        • 3312

        Bloody GWS have already caused us grief. They've split our supporter base into two factions, The pure bloods ( Swans supporters) and Half bloods ( Swans/GWS supporters). What next GWS!!! I guess the positive for the Half bloods is if GWS turns into a disaster and they merge with us, then they would be able to support both teams every week at half the price !

        Comment

        • DLBIA14
          On the Rookie List
          • May 2010
          • 673

          Am I the only one who has a problem with GWS dominating discussion OUR trade week thread?? Take it to another board people.

          Anyway, if Port wants Seaby I'd prefer players instead of picks as compo. Clearly Seaby doesn't have much trade currency but maybe both clubs could put something together... Surjan wouldn't be so bad. Better than a pick in the 50s-60s in a shallow draft.

          Comment

          • DLBIA14
            On the Rookie List
            • May 2010
            • 673

            Originally posted by bedford
            They won't keep them all, they can trade to get a gun recruit now. We could say trade a Moore and Malceski and maybe get a top 10 draft pick.
            They're not that stupid. Anyway clearly they have a preference for picks which is somewhat surprising. I also don't really like the idea of trading Mal away. His current trade value is well below his capabilities as a player. Moore on the other deserves to go to another club and get his chance. GWS could surely use his experience and ball winning abilities. Hard player, good work ethic and very cheap.

            Comment

            • swanspant12
              On the Rookie List
              • Oct 2009
              • 593

              if mumford gets injured next year, and god forbid he gets injured the whole year, who is going to replace us as our first ruckman? dont think its a good idea trading seaby to be honest
              LRT. Lord Roberts-Thompson. He may look like the Munster, but looks can be deceiving.


              2012 Bloods Premiers.

              Comment

              • robamiee
                Regular in the Side
                • Sep 2005
                • 688

                i agree DL....
                we talk about players coming that aren't getting games, yet look at McGlynn, ZKennedy etc now...

                Comment

                • ernie koala
                  Senior Player
                  • May 2007
                  • 3251

                  Originally posted by robamiee
                  i agree DL....
                  we talk about players coming that aren't getting games, yet look at McGlynn, ZKennedy etc now...
                  Difference is they came from Hawthorn.....not Port.....that's a big difference.
                  Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it's time to pause and reflect... MT

                  Comment

                  • DLBIA14
                    On the Rookie List
                    • May 2010
                    • 673

                    Originally posted by ernie koala
                    Difference is they came from Hawthorn.....not Port.....that's a big difference.
                    Absolutely. That's why I'm so keen on Macaffer who is in the 20-25 group at Collingwood. Still, PA or not a very late pick in this draft is essentially nothing. I'd rather a something would hasn't yet put it all together or who has fallen a little out of favour.

                    Edit: or even a couple of draft pick upgrades...

                    Comment

                    • Big Al
                      Veterans List
                      • Feb 2005
                      • 7007

                      Originally posted by Melbourne_Blood
                      Bloody GWS have already caused us grief. They've split our supporter base into two factions, The pure bloods ( Swans supporters) and Half bloods ( Swans/GWS supporters). What next GWS!!! I guess the positive for the Half bloods is if GWS turns into a disaster and they merge with us, then they would be able to support both teams every week at half the price !
                      The only grief is from you people that just don't get that a Sydney supporter can go to a GWS game without it affecting the passion for the Swans.

                      The fact that someone would question my commitment to the Swans because I want to see more footy and see AFL thrive in Sydney is laughable and quite frankly I'm sick of the whole GWS debate on here. (half bloods indeed... How offensive is that. sigh!!! )
                      Last edited by Big Al; 13 October 2011, 04:41 PM.
                      ..And the Swans are the Premiers...The Ultimate Team...The Ultimate Warriors. They have overcome the highly fancied Hawks in brilliant style. Sydney the 2012 Premiers - Gerard Whately ABC

                      Here it is Again! - Huddo SEN

                      Comment

                      • alison.z
                        Regular in the Side
                        • Aug 2006
                        • 988

                        Talked about Currie briefly on Trade Week Radio - insinuated that it is all dependent on Seaby ... He goes and Currie stays or Seaby stays and Currie goes ... Seaby has more trade currency so you would think he would go and Currie gets another year?! Still no progress from Port today though ...

                        Comment

                        • alison.z
                          Regular in the Side
                          • Aug 2006
                          • 988

                          Originally posted by Big Al
                          The only grief is from you people that just don't get that a Sydney supporter can go to a GWS game without it affecting the passion for the Swans.

                          The fact that someone would question my commitment to the Swans because I want to see more footy and see AFL thrive Sydney is laughable and quite frankly I'm sick of the whole GWS debate on here. (half bloods indeed... How offensive is that. sigh!!! )
                          +1 - I can't wait for more football in Sydney next year! Doesn't mean I will be any less fanatical about the Swans ...

                          Comment

                          • msb
                            On the Rookie List
                            • Mar 2006
                            • 827

                            Originally posted by swanspant12
                            if mumford gets injured next year, and god forbid he gets injured the whole year, who is going to replace us as our first ruckman? dont think its a good idea trading seaby to be honest
                            I agree, I dont get the seaby trade. If mummy goes down injured we are in trouble. Pyke as a first ruck option does not appeal to me at all, nor does LRT and white needs to develop more as a forward. So who's left? Currie?

                            Comment

                            • Big Al
                              Veterans List
                              • Feb 2005
                              • 7007

                              Originally posted by msb
                              I agree, I dont get the seaby trade. If mummy goes down injured we are in trouble. Pyke as a first ruck option does not appeal to me at all, nor does LRT and white needs to develop more as a forward. So who's left? Currie?
                              So you want the poor bugger to languish in the NEAFL just in case Mummy gets injured.

                              He deserves to the no.1 at a club. He's obviously asked for a trade and good on the club for exploring that option.

                              Pyke is improving all the time and Currie had an outstanding year in the NEAFL so it's not as though we are out of options if Mummy goes down.
                              ..And the Swans are the Premiers...The Ultimate Team...The Ultimate Warriors. They have overcome the highly fancied Hawks in brilliant style. Sydney the 2012 Premiers - Gerard Whately ABC

                              Here it is Again! - Huddo SEN

                              Comment

                              • Melbourne_Blood
                                Senior Player
                                • May 2010
                                • 3312

                                Originally posted by Big Al
                                The only grief is from you people that just don't get that a Sydney supporter can go to a GWS game without it affecting the passion for the Swans.

                                The fact that someone would question my commitment to the Swans because I want to see more footy and see AFL thrive in Sydney is laughable and quite frankly I'm sick of the whole GWS debate on here. (half bloods indeed... How offensive is that. sigh!!! )
                                Its a joke mate, i know how worked up everyone gets, i frankly couldnt give a rats. Just thought i'd stir it a bit. ( was also a Harry Potter reference lol )

                                Comment

                                Working...