Trade target discussion (merged thread)

[AnnieH]

Jetts wants a four-year contract.

[Nico]

Not sure what they were expecting for a bloke who isn't in their best 22

He was their vice captain and was injured during the finals. Having said that I think WCE are slightly over rating him. Not a first round compensation pick candidate. They say he is good leader, but how do you rate leadership, and besides was not a highly paid player so they weren't paying him for his leadership qualities. Regardless of his brother playing for Geelong, I would say Selwood went there for the Laurie Nash.

[Swansongster]

ps what compo pick would we get for Jetta if we don't trade ?

after selwood being given around 37 ?

Sigh! Miss that number already.

[lwjoyner]

It looks loke we will be left with the steak knives for Jetta, again we are gazumped.

[Mr Magoo]

It looks loke we will be left with the steak knives for Jetta, again we are gazumped.

There is about half a dozen teams ahead of west coast that could easily decide to take Jetta if we went through to the pre season draft. I dont think he or west coast would want to take that risk.

[aardvark]

There is about half a dozen teams ahead of west coast that could easily decide to take Jetta if we went through to the pre season draft. I dont think he or west coast would want to take that risk.

I doubt very much if he would nominate for the PSD. I reckon he'd just go and play state league for a year.

[aardvark]

This is interesting......Big Eagle to become a Swan | AFL at The Roar TV Looks like it's a done deal.

[Go Swannies]

This is interesting......Big Eagle to become a Swan | AFL at The Roar TV Looks like it's a done deal.

That's been up since yesterday, though.

[caj23]

Don't stress it peeps, I'm sure we've got it in hand

[Mr Magoo]

I doubt very much if he would nominate for the PSD. I reckon he'd just go and play state league for a year.

Even if he did that , wouldnt he still have to nominate for the draft the following year ? Surely you cant just take a year out and avoid the whole draft process altogether.

[aardvark]

That's been up since yesterday, though.

If, as reported, Sinclair has been offered 4 years on 400k and 1st ruck duties compared to 250k and back up to Nic Nat it's hard to understand why he would knock it back. Maybe he likes the "social scene" better in W.A.

[aardvark]

Even if he did that , wouldnt he still have to nominate for the draft the following year ? Surely you cant just take a year out and avoid the whole draft process altogether.

You are probably right. It will be interesting to see how it plays out. If he did go and play State League for a year wouldn't he still be contracted to us for his last year thus making him still ours to trade next year?

[RogueSwan]

This is interesting......Big Eagle to become a Swan | AFL at The Roar TV Looks like it's a done deal.

Don't you just love the $ signs in the news graphic $ydney $wans, as if we have loads of money that other teams don't.

[aardvark]

Don't you just love the $ signs in the news graphic $ydney $wans, as if we have loads of money that other teams don't.

Umm....I think we still do.....shhhh

[swansrob]

Don't you just love the $ signs in the news graphic $ydney $wans, as if we have loads of money that other teams don't.

Thought the same thing - with the trade restrictions still in place, we have less than anyone else