2020 trading, drafting and list management: players and personnel

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • barry
    Veterans List
    • Jan 2003
    • 8499

    Mummy's career is amazing. Why did we ever let him go. His longevity is simply amazing.
    Even after leaving us 7 years ago, he's still better than any ruckman on our list.

    Comment

    • Ruck'n'Roll
      Ego alta, ergo ictus
      • Nov 2003
      • 3990

      Originally posted by jono2707
      No point taking a pick 5 then sitting them on the sidelines.....
      I get why the Swans apparently set all the new recruits down and give them all the "everyone starts from the same point, you're all equal" speech - seems such an attitude would explain explain how well the Swans have done with later picks and rookies.

      But I wander whether the hot-house flowers at the top end of the draft, so used to being feted, respond to such an attitude - especially if it involves a season or two awaiting debut.

      Maybe not so well, historically we've been somewhat less successful with picks from that end.

      Thoughts?
      Last edited by Ruck'n'Roll; 6 July 2020, 05:31 PM.

      Comment

      • Blood Fever
        Veterans List
        • Apr 2007
        • 4040

        Originally posted by Ruck'n'Roll
        I get why the Swans apparently set all the new recruits down and give them all the "everyone starts from the same point, you're all equal" speech - seems such an attitude would explain explain how well the Swans have done with later picks and rookies.

        But I wander whether the hot-house flowers at the top end of the draft, so used to being feted, respond to such an attitude - especially if it involves a season or two awaiting debut.

        Maybe not so well, historically we've been somewhat less successful with picks from that end.

        Thoughts?
        Culturally sound practice I reckon. Don't reckon it has cost us a good player but happy for you to contradict me if you have examples.

        Comment

        • barry
          Veterans List
          • Jan 2003
          • 8499

          Originally posted by Blood Fever
          Culturally sound practice I reckon. Don't reckon it has cost us a good player but happy for you to contradict me if you have examples.
          Mitchell had to spend a long time in the 2's before cracking the seniors. Then left.

          Comment

          • 0918330512
            Senior Player
            • Sep 2011
            • 1654

            Originally posted by barry
            Mitchell had to spend a long time in the 2's before cracking the seniors. Then left.
            You have to paint the full picture. Hawthorn offered him significantly more than we could. Then he left.

            Comment

            • Markwebbos
              Veterans List
              • Jul 2016
              • 7186

              Originally posted by barry
              Mitchell had to spend a long time in the 2's before cracking the seniors. Then left.
              Also Mitchell was not a first round draft pick

              Comment

              • 0918330512
                Senior Player
                • Sep 2011
                • 1654

                Originally posted by barry
                Mummy's career is amazing. Why did we ever let him go. His longevity is simply amazing.
                Even after leaving us 7 years ago, he's still better than any ruckman on our list.
                Full picture. Why did we let him go? We needed cap space to get a guy called Buddy. We had a guy in Mike Pyke. He was quite handy at the time this all transpired. If the list management team had the benefit of 20/20 hindsight, a different decision might have been made. But it didn’t. Time to move on ... 7 years ago.

                - - - Updated - - -

                Originally posted by Markwebbos
                Also Mitchell was not a first round draft pick
                Although he might have been if we didn’t get him father/son

                Comment

                • The Big Cat
                  On the veteran's list
                  • Apr 2006
                  • 2350

                  Originally posted by Markwebbos
                  Also Mitchell was not a first round draft pick
                  Not a damaging player. Most clubs don’t even tag him.
                  Those who have the greatest power to hurt us are those we love.

                  Comment

                  • Blood Fever
                    Veterans List
                    • Apr 2007
                    • 4040

                    Originally posted by The Big Cat
                    Not a damaging player. Most clubs don’t even tag him.
                    Kicks a lot of up and unders..Ball magnet and good player but 20 possies for Dusty equals about 50 for Tommy. Left because we couldn't afford him but we paid him big bucks as a very young player. His old man was a bit of a mercenary as well.

                    Comment

                    • Ruck'n'Roll
                      Ego alta, ergo ictus
                      • Nov 2003
                      • 3990

                      Originally posted by 09183305
                      Time to move on ... 7 years ago.
                      This isn't really the place for discussing Mummy (there is a past players thread) but I don't think there is any statute of limitations on learning from the past.
                      Last edited by Ruck'n'Roll; 7 July 2020, 04:28 PM.

                      Comment

                      • Aprilbr
                        Senior Player
                        • Oct 2016
                        • 1803

                        Looking at our ruck problems - there was a time, not so long ago, when we had Naismith, Nankervis, Tippett all competing for a ruck spot or two. We decided to trade Nankervis to Richmond where they promised him that he would be given more opportunity. Nankervis has proven to be durable and continued to improve. He is now a two-time premiership player. The demise of Tippett is well chronicled on here. The upshot is we made an unfortunate choice with Nankervis. We have brought in Sinclair in recent years who has given his all and in recent seasons has been our sole ruckman most of the time. I give him top marks for his effort and courage. Sadly, he is nowhere near the top ruckmen in the league. He provides a contest though. We traded Cameron at the end of last season. It will be interesting to watch whether he can cement a senior spot in the strong Collingwood line-up that features the game's best big man. Knoll also has been recruited in the past 2 seasons but seems to be mostly injured.

                        Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk

                        Comment

                        • barry
                          Veterans List
                          • Jan 2003
                          • 8499

                          Originally posted by Aprilbr
                          Looking at our ruck problems - there was a time, not so long ago, when we had Naismith, Nankervis, Tippett all competing for a ruck spot or two. We decided to trade Nankervis to Richmond where they promised him that he would be given more opportunity. Nankervis has proven to be durable and continued to improve. He is now a two-time premiership player. The demise of Tippett is well chronicled on here. The upshot is we made an unfortunate choice with Nankervis. We have brought in Sinclair in recent years who has given his all and in recent seasons has been our sole ruckman most of the time. I give him top marks for his effort and courage. Sadly, he is nowhere near the top ruckmen in the league. He provides a contest though. We traded Cameron at the end of last season. It will be interesting to watch whether he can cement a senior spot in the strong Collingwood line-up that features the game's best big man. Knoll also has been recruited in the past 2 seasons but seems to be mostly injured.

                          Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
                          Based on that starting list of ruckman, we really had no way to keep Nankervis. He's always be behind Naismith and Tippett, and Nankervis is only good as a ruckman. He cant play anywhere else.
                          The only way we could have kept him would be to trade out Naismith and Tippett to someone else.

                          Even though Sinclair has been our no.1 ruckman for a couple of years, we will never be a contender while he is in the side. Many teams have a tailsman where you say "if xxx is getting a game, they cant win a flag". Sinclair is out xxx.

                          Cameron wont amount to much I think.

                          Its a real pity Knoll has been injured so much. I had high hopes for him.

                          Comment

                          • aguy
                            Senior Player
                            • Mar 2014
                            • 1324

                            We really should go after Preuss now that Melbourne have recruited Luke Jackson

                            Comment

                            • KSAS
                              Senior Player
                              • Mar 2018
                              • 1770

                              Originally posted by aguy
                              We really should go after Preuss now that Melbourne have recruited Luke Jackson
                              +1
                              I heard Matt Rendell say the other day when doing his draft anaylsis, that Gulden is the best left foot kick he's ever seen for his age.

                              Comment

                              • Mr Magoo
                                Senior Player
                                • May 2008
                                • 1255

                                Originally posted by KSAS
                                +1
                                I heard Matt Rendell say the other day when doing his draft anaylsis, that Gulden is the best left foot kick he's ever seen for his age.
                                I think he was speaking of Campbell. Draft Central has Campbell at pick 6 in their latest release of draft rankings.

                                Comment

                                Working...