2021 trading, drafting and list management: players and personnel

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • The Big Cat
    On the veteran's list
    • Apr 2006
    • 2350

    Originally posted by tlock
    Hodor on Dawson. There's a good chance Dawson stays a Swan.
    Hodor on Ladhams. We can get him next year for free.
    Ok I’ll be the one to bite. Who the hell is Hodor?
    Those who have the greatest power to hurt us are those we love.

    Comment

    • MattW
      Veterans List
      • May 2011
      • 4195

      Originally posted by Ludwig
      Patrick Lipinski went for pick 43. That's the kind of pick a team can expect when the player wants to leave to a specific club and their current club doesn't want him to stay. Port should be happy with pick 39 for Ladhams. We are holding the cards in this trade.
      Lipinski was out of contract and not in the best 22, unlike Ladhams.

      The additional ~15 picks is the premium to get him a year early. I tend to think it's worth it, given we want to compete for a top 4 spot next year and we have near zero ruck depth.
      Last edited by MattW; 12 October 2021, 09:03 PM.

      Comment

      • goswannies
        Senior Player
        • Sep 2007
        • 3048

        Fox reporting we rolled over and took the Dees pick for Dawson

        https://www.google.com.au/amp/s/www.foxsports.com.au/afl/teams/adelaide-crows/afl-trade-news-2021-jordan-dawson-trade-to-adelaide-deal-with-sydney-completed-deal-details-tom-morris-story/news-story/fc8984147674a5c31ac853d1786f1b14

        Comment

        • MattW
          Veterans List
          • May 2011
          • 4195

          Ok, Michael Gleeson reports that we're accepting Melbourne future first rounder flat for Dawson.

          Michael Gleeson on Twitter: "After much gnashing of teeth Swans agree to accept future first from Crows - the melb pick - for Dawson. No other picks involved. Agreed tonight. Will go through 2pm tomorrow."

          Undervalued, but the reality.

          That'll guarantee at least two games a round with strong interest next year!

          Comment

          • troyjones2525
            Swans Fanatic!
            • Mar 2008
            • 2908

            Yep, reports everywhere that we've accepted Dees future first rounder for Dawson with no other picks attached.

            Like Liz said earlier, we really didn't have a lot of bargaining power and pretty much had to accept so let's hope the Dees do what they have done so often and put in a shocker next year!

            Over to you now Ladhams!

            Sent from my SM-G998B using Tapatalk

            Comment

            • The Big Cat
              On the veteran's list
              • Apr 2006
              • 2350

              Originally posted by MattW
              Ok, Michael Gleeson reports that we're accepting Melbourne future first rounder flat for Dawson

              Undervalued!
              We won’t know that until next year. Dees may do a dogs of 2017 and the deal will look a lot better.

              Also 2 first rounders next year may be vital in getting someone outstanding.
              Those who have the greatest power to hurt us are those we love.

              Comment

              • Aprilbr
                Senior Player
                • Oct 2016
                • 1803

                I'm actually relieved to hear that outcome. Its the best we could do in the difficult circumstances.

                Comment

                • Aprilbr
                  Senior Player
                  • Oct 2016
                  • 1803

                  Originally posted by The Big Cat
                  Ok I’ll be the one to bite. Who the hell is Hodor?
                  He was a character in Games of Thrones. Don't you see the obvious connection to the JD trade? [emoji3][emoji3][emoji3]

                  I think it was a typo and he meant hold onto JD. Too late for that now.
                  Last edited by Aprilbr; 12 October 2021, 10:06 PM.

                  Comment

                  • WomblingFree
                    Warming the Bench
                    • Sep 2021
                    • 104

                    Originally posted by liz
                    I think at this stage I'd just take the Melbourne future first. It could be fun having a team to death watch next season. Melbourne were great this year but I'm not particularly confident they'll back it up. They had a pretty good run with injury, particularly with their best half dozen players. And if they fall, I think they could fall in a heap based on past years' performances. But I'd leave Adelaide with the message that we believe we've been short-changed.

                    As for Port, I'd tell them that pick 31 is all that's on the table. I'd tell them we've just been screwed over by Adelaide and we're not taking it from them too. I'd remind them that we traded them Aliir last year for a worse pick. And that (at least according to the AFL site) that we've agreed to take his full final year payments onto our books. If they have their eyes on someone like O'Meara (as is rumoured), that might clear the space they need.
                    Spot on. Sadly our hand was weak. Two first rounders next year will allow us to be very active, hopefully with cap space.

                    And as you say it’s pick 31 or nowt for Ladhams…..

                    Comment

                    • dejavoodoo44
                      Veterans List
                      • Apr 2015
                      • 8494

                      I do hope that we have re-signed Sam Wicks. I mean, if the Crows are going to play Dawson off the half back flank, then Wicks is the one most likely of our forwards to bury him in the turf. Or maybe Heeney? Perhaps McLean if he gets too close?

                      Comment

                      • The Big Cat
                        On the veteran's list
                        • Apr 2006
                        • 2350

                        Originally posted by Aprilbr
                        He was a character in Games of Thrones. Don't you see the obvious connection to the JD trade? [emoji3][emoji3][emoji3]
                        What is game of thrones?
                        Those who have the greatest power to hurt us are those we love.

                        Comment

                        • liz
                          Veteran
                          Site Admin
                          • Jan 2003
                          • 16738

                          Originally posted by MattW
                          Lipinski was out of contract and not in the best 22, unlike Ladhams.

                          The additional ~15 picks is the premium to get him a year early. I tend to think it's worth it, given we want to compete for a top 4 spot next year and we have near zero ruck depth.
                          Aliir was in contract and in our best 22 when we traded him last year. For pick 39 (? or thereabouts).

                          I don't agree we have near zero ruck depth. Sinclair, while not great, will always give a wholesome effort if called upon. Amartey hasn't done more than relief ruck so far, but he might be capable of more if needed. We could also give Reid another year.

                          The reality is that if we are going to contend next year, we need Hickey to play the majority of games. But we do have enough in reserve to pick the odd game here and there to give him a rest.

                          Comment

                          • Markwebbos
                            Veterans List
                            • Jul 2016
                            • 7186

                            That’s disappointing about JD, but clearly we had no other card to play. I’ll be interested to see what else we get up to.

                            I really hope we don’t overpay for Ladhams.

                            Still wouldn’t mind us having a crack at Sicily.

                            Comment

                            • WomblingFree
                              Warming the Bench
                              • Sep 2021
                              • 104

                              Originally posted by Markwebbos
                              That’s disappointing about JD, but clearly we had no other card to play. I’ll be interested to see what else we get up to.

                              I really hope we don’t overpay for Ladhams.

                              Still wouldn’t mind us having a crack at Sicily.
                              Ladhams is young enough to develop well. I think you need two genuine ruckman in your best 22 but one needs to also be able to play up forward. Only time will tell of course but he could be a handy pick up

                              Comment

                              • Aprilbr
                                Senior Player
                                • Oct 2016
                                • 1803

                                Its an interesting debate as to whether we would have been better off to have accepted Adelaide's early offer of this year's 17 pick or what we ended up with - a most likely low first round pick for next season. Normally, one would say this year's pick is better for the reasons outlined by Ludwig a while back (one year's extra contribution by the selected player) but the uncertainty of the form of players due to Covid interruptions makes it a less clear cut comparison this time. Also, we weren't to know then that Adelaide would subsequently make that huge offer for the No 1 pick that included all of their first rounders.

                                Comment

                                Working...