I assume, by premature, you mean based on literally decades of them throwing up random suggestions and occasionally getting some right?
This isn’t a new thing that journo’s do, and neither is the criticism of them.
For Swans matters, guys like Healy and Neil Cordy - who seem to have a good relationship with the club - more often get it right … and they less often make grandiose predictions or speculation. That’s the difference between sharp shooter journalism and the shot gun approach. Both will get things right, some might cause a little collateral damage along the way.
Please refrain for asking anyone on RWO to apologise to the journos when the media perpetrators don’t apologise for getting things wrong. And getting them wrong often. They are often critical of our club and our players. They should be open to criticism themselves if they are putting things out there.
This isn’t a new thing that journo’s do, and neither is the criticism of them.
For Swans matters, guys like Healy and Neil Cordy - who seem to have a good relationship with the club - more often get it right … and they less often make grandiose predictions or speculation. That’s the difference between sharp shooter journalism and the shot gun approach. Both will get things right, some might cause a little collateral damage along the way.
Please refrain for asking anyone on RWO to apologise to the journos when the media perpetrators don’t apologise for getting things wrong. And getting them wrong often. They are often critical of our club and our players. They should be open to criticism themselves if they are putting things out there.


Comment